Contact Us

Use the form to contact us.

You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right. 

Name *
Name
Type the word EARTH in the field below to help us filter spam

27 Lantree Crescent
Cambridge, CB2 9NJ
United Kingdom

07405524383

Circumplast is the safest circumcision disposable ring for male babies and children. We are sole distributor in UK. It is better than Plastibell. Centres who are using the Circumplast device are located  at London, Cambridge, Leyton,  and Luton,

Blog

Circumplast is ideal for baby and boys circumcions 

Trends in penile cancer: a comparative study between Australia, England and Wales, and the US

Javaria Akram

Circumcision rates have a potential influence on these rates but are not the sole explanation for the variation

PURPOSE:

To investigate and compare the trends in incidence and mortality of penile cancer between Australia, England and Wales, and the US, and provide hypotheses for these trends.

METHODS:

Cancer registry data from 1982 to 2005 inclusive were obtained from Australia, England and Wales, and the United States. From these data, age-specific, -standardised and mortality:incidence ratios were calculated, and compared.

RESULTS:

The overall incidence of penile cancer in England and Wales (1.44 per 100,000 man-years) was higher than in Australia (0.80 per 100,000), and the US (0.66 per 100,000). Incidence of penile cancer in all three countries has remained relatively stable over time. Similarly, although the mortality rates were also higher in England and Wales (0.37 per 100,000 man-years) compared to Australia (0.18 per 100,000) and the US (0.15 per 100,000), the mortality/incidence ratios were similar for all three countries.

CONCLUSIONS:

Penile cancer incidence is low, affecting mainly older men. Rates differ between the three countries, being twice as common in England and Wales as in the other studied regions. Circumcision rates have a potential influence on these rates but are not the sole explanation for the variation

SOURCE:

Springerplus. 2015 Aug 14;4:420.

DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1191-4