Feedback
Paediatric Surgeons, Urologists and GP specialsit in circumcision have given their views of Circumplast Circumcision in male children.
"I have been using Plastibell for the last 20 years; I always think there are serious complications associated with Plastibell, which could be prevented by changing the design. Circumplast devices eliminate the risk of proximal migration due to their cylindrical design. The glans of the penis are kept completely covered by the device, which could prevent meatal stenosis in the future. The Circumplast devices are unique in allowing the surgeon to secure the ligature at multiple locations, unlike the Plastibell. The proximal tip of the device helps cut the inner mucosa very close to the coronal sulcus. This also prevents future adhesion of the inner mucosal skin to the glans of the penis and gives a better cosmetic appearance. Due to these reasons, I have been using the Circumpilast device for the last 10 years with excellent results." ARK (Paediatric Urologist, London, UK)
“Circumplast has minimum risk of migrating to shaft of the penis as compare to the Plastibell device in newborn circumcision ”